Top.Mail.Ru
Monica :: Tazria-Metzora
? ?
Recent Entries Friends Archive Profile Tags
 
 
 
 
 
 
The rabbi Friday night didn't focus on the parts of lashon hara (evil speech) that I expected him to; he mostly talked about when you should speak up about someone and how to go about it. So that left me free to talk more about it Saturday morning, though I didn't want to come off as presumptuous by saying anything along the lines of "you should[n't] do X". I'm not a rabbi, after all; I have no standing to lecture people about behavior. (And anyway, there's the whole glass-houses thing; I should work on myself before I try to change others.)

As an aside, I've tried a few different approaches to giving these mini-sermons. They're long enough that speaking entirely from memory is iffy. The setting is informal enough that reading from a prepared text feels awkward; in addition, I just don't have the dynamic down yet of reading while looking at people. (When I've given Friday-night sermons I've done this, though; the podium-style reading desk helps hide the paper while putting it where I can see both it and the congregation.) This week, I tried just talking from an outline, something that has sometimes worked in the past. It worked pretty well this time, so I think that's my answer.

For the record, then, my outline read as follows:

tzara'at <-- LH
other sins?
pillow
no undo; must change
3 phases w/rebuke [all white?]
not punishment - prod
LH harm widespread

This is (approximately) what I said from that outline:

This week we read about tzara'at, usually translated as "leprosy". This isn't leprosy in the modern medical sense; it's a spiritual affliction, not a medical condition. Our sages agree that it results from lashon hara, evil speech.

One question that strikes me about this is: why is this transgression singled out for special treatment? There are many other sins that harm other people in serious ways -- murder, stealing, cheating in business, and so on. Yet we don't hear of something like tazra'at for murderers. Why not?

There is a famous story in which a man goes to his rebbe and says: I have committed lashon hara and I want to make it good; what do I do? The rebbe tells him: go home, get your largest feather pillow, take it to the center of town, rip it open, and wave it around until the case is empty; then come back to me. The man thinks this is an odd penance, but he does as his rebbe tells him. The next day he returns to the rebbe and says: I have done what you asked; am I forgiven now? No, says the rebbe, that was only the first half. Now you have to go back to the center of town and gather up every one of the feathers.

The man protests -- that's impossible! Those feathers have scattered far and wide by now; how could I find them all? Ah, says the rebbe -- the feathers are like your words.

With lashon hara you can't undo the damage. There is no compensation that will make things right with the victim. Once it's said, it's out there. So the only way to fix it is to change yourself so that you don't say it in the future.

Tzara'at proceeds in three stages. The torah talks about them in the opposite order, but first your house is afflicted. If this happens, the kohein comes, diagnoses it, rebukes you, and tells you to mend your ways. If that doesn't work then your clothes are afflicted -- and the kohein comes, diagnoses it, rebukes you, and tells you to mend your ways. If even that doesn't work, then your body is afflicted -- and the kohein comes, diagnoses it, rebukes you, tells you to mend your ways, and sends you into quarantine where you have no choice but to face the problem and deal with it, because you're not coming back until the affliction clears.

[I was considering talking about the case where the person is completely afflicted here, but decided against based on time.]

I said before that tzara'at results from lashon hara. I didn't say that it's a punishment, because I don't think it is. It's structured to be a wake-up call, a warning, a prod to change your behavior. We don't get these warnings today, so we have to be careful to monitor ourselves -- we won't get an ominous blotch in the plaster to tell us we're messing up.

Lashon hara is a serious issue. In addition to spreading very quickly like the feathers, it also affects a large number of people, as people hear it, judge the target of the gossip, and spread it further. The feathers don't just spread; they multiply. This is why we have to catch it early, whether through a blotch in the plaster or our own awareness of what we are about to say.

 
 
 
 
 
 
I've heard it several times before. The Catholics always say the religious leader was a R.C. priest, the Jews always say he's a Rabbi. :) I'd be greatly amused if I ever heard a version where the speaker and the holy man were different faiths. :D :D
-- Dagonell
Good stuff. The stand-in-quasi-rabbi for us yesterday pointed out that it's unusual in that it is something that you need an outside expert to come in and diagnose -- the implication being that we see tend to dismiss or forgive ourselves for things that others can see clearly.
Good point. We defer to outside authorities all the time to judge matters before they come into play -- whether this meat is kosher, whether that mezuzah is damaged, whether that clothing is sha'atnez, etc -- but this may be the only specific case where an outsider judges after the fact. (There is, of course, the general case of a beit din to settle disputes, but that's a little different.)
A Rabbi who gave a talk at the minyan I attended (he's not the Rabbi of the minyan; he's A Rabbi who goes to the minyan) gave a very interesting talk. He started by saying that 10 minutes wasn't enough time to do justice to Taria/metzorah, so he was going to talk about Shemini (last week), T/M, and Achare Mot (next week) in 10 minutes. And Israeli independence day. Oh, and did I mention that on Thursday he had been told that he might be asked to give the talk, because the organizer couldn't remember who was signed up for it? It was very interesting, and I can't do it justice, but the basic gist was that he saw these four parshot as describing an arc: in Shemini there's the celebratory initiation of the tabernacle, and God's presence once more returns to the camp (after the Golden calf episode), and then there's the sudden death of Aaron's oldest sons. Instead of dealing with the death directly, there's an intermission where we learn about detailed laws of permissable foods, and incredibly detailed laws about skin diseases... before returning to real life: dealing with "after the death of Aaron's sons". He made a parallel to the way the new holidays of yom hashoah/zikaron/HaAtzMa'ut break into the narrative of the omer, and how we're still figuring out how to deal with and remember and celebrate these new days (commemorating the holocaust, israeli soldiers, israeli independence).
That sounds interesting. Have the couple millenia of addressing the Torah narrative helped to untangle the ~50 years of these holidays for him? :-) (I suspect that an answer, for some people, is that the continuity of the Omer becomes less important, because it's now broken up where it wasn't before. Do we now have a generation of people who have trouble remembering to count every single night?)
Well, the way he put it, the pesach/shavuot/sukkot holidays are well established, and have a set of observances which people are pretty comfortable with. The more modern purim/hannukah holidays also have their narrative and their observances. the new ones, however, are new. Their observance is still being figured out. He told a very moving and funny story about the sirens that they use in Israel to commemorate yom hashoah and yom hazikaron, but that's not something that really translates that well to other countries, I think. (It's not the same unless everything stops, and that's not too likely outside Israel.)